|
Perhaps the most surprising thing about
Hollywood is not how debauched, depraved
and decadent its stories are — considering
how untouched this area of American culture
is from Christian influence, we could hardly
expect different. No, what is most surprising is
how many films still manage to capture brief
flickering lights of truth in an industry that
feeds almost solely upon darkness — a
darkness that disguises itself as “tolerance”
(when it is in fact a refusal to acknowledge any
moral law) and “self-empowerment” (that is in
reality little more than self worship).
True, our silver screen icons celebrate
fornication, adultery, and blasphemy at nearly
every turn, but the truth that God has written in
their hearts remains, so that, in spite of
themselves, they also occasionally celebrate
mercy, justice, fidelity, and faith. As a result,
you can have an abortion activist like Ed Harris
(a man who recently stated that it would be a
“catastrophe” if Roe v. Wade were overturned)
appearing in a film like Radio that
unabashedly argues for the value of every
human life.
One of the most striking examples of this
disparity in recent years has got to be that
between J.R.R. Tolkien, author of The Lord
of the Rings and the filmmakers who
adapted his story. All art in one way or another
takes on the worldview of its creator, and so it
did in the case of this Christian writer. Tolkien
acknowledged as much when he called his
trilogy a “fundamentally religious work,” and
said he resented criticism that his stories
“contain no religion.” But if the people behind
the films are aware of these sentiments, they
are, for the most part, unwilling (or unable) to
consider them.
The Author v. The Filmmakers
At the recent press junket I attended for The
Return of the King, some of the actors, the
screenwriters, and director Peter Jackson
begrudgingly paid lip service to Tolkien’s
well-documented Christian worldview.
However, deeper questioning revealed that
they had little understanding of how that
worldview manifested itself in Tolkien’s work.
Something close to desperation drifted
palpably on the air as the interviewees
grasped at any trendy “ism” — from
multiculturalism to environmentalism — trying
to recast the Christian subtext of Tolkien’s
edifying myth.
Asked specifically about the religious
elements in the trilogy, actor Orlando Bloom
(Legolas) made a vague reference to an
awareness of the “spirit” and “energy” that
defined Tolkien’s writing. Further pressed to
define that “spirit,” he seemed to strain for
words, speaking once again about the film
and his own experience rather than the book
in question: “It’s very positive. … It’s about a
group of strangers, of mixed races, putting
aside all of their … differences to come
together to make a difference. … And New
Zealand, which is a classless society in many
respects … that we were all treated with
equality there had an effect on us when
making this film. … ”
Similarly questioned about the religious
themes in the trilogy, director Peter Jackson
appealed to Tolkien’s well-known love of
nature: “He [Tolkien] hated the way the English
country side had been destroyed by the
industrial revolution in the 1880s. The Shire
represents what happened to the England that
he loved. There was pollution, forests being
cut down. … ”
While Jackson wasn’t wrong on his point that
Tolkien disliked industrial progress, when he
proceeded to magnify this element in favor of
much weightier and well conceived themes,
he demonstrated a profound lack of
understanding of the trilogy’s defining
struggle: “The ring is obviously a metaphor for
the machines, the factories, that enslave you,
that take away your free will.”
Though many elements in the trilogy might
represent harmful industry, it is fairly obvious
to Christian readers that the ring is not one of
them. To a redeemed reader, the “One Ring”
could be symbolic of several things —
temptation, lust for power, idolatry — but all of
them point to one reality: sin. Small and
innocuous as it is, in its hold over those who
wear it, the ring is very much like a lion
seeking whomever it can devour. In fact, one
might say that all the various “owners” of the
ring eventually end up becoming slaves to it.
Actor Ian McKellan took a different tack on the
question of the books’ religion altogether,
refusing even to acknowledge that there are
any Christian undertones in the them. Flying in
the face of Tolkien’s own assessment,
McKellan stated, “I wouldn't say there's an
appeal in this story to any particular set of
beliefs… I note with delight that Hobbiton is a
community without a church. … There is no
set of beliefs in this story, no credo.”
However, once the cast and crew moved past
their initial hesitations about having to answer
questions related to spirituality, their
responses to the Christian journalists’
questions concerning Tolkien’s faith began to
reveal shared worldviews of their own.
Absolute Standards v. Moral
Relativity
True to biblical philosophy, Tolkien’s
characters believe very much in the concept of
absolute evil, that there is a terror in the East
that must be defeated. Most of Jackson’s cast
and crew very much did not.
Though he played Aragorn, great warrior and
defender against monstrous evil on screen,
Viggo Mortensen the actor was reluctant to
pass value judgments, or even admit that the
trilogy does so: “It's [The Lord of the Rings] not
necessarily promoting one particular
philosophy … but saying that if you accept that
there are differences in the world and are
prepared to embrace those differences, to
approach the world in a positive, loving way,
you may actually be able to change the nature
of the human race.” One wonders how the
Fellowship would have fared had they simply
“accepted” and “embraced” the Orcs
“differences.”
Screenwriter Philippa Boyens also seemed
particularly offended by the notion that the
battles in the books are predicated upon a
fixed sense of good and evil: "The fight [in
'Lord of the Rings'] is not about [an] …
agenda-driven sense of right or wrong. Rather
it's about Tolkien's humanism … because you
don't trust these things when you're a
humanist — these tub-thumping notions of
what's good and what's evil." Questioned
about what constitutes tub-thumping, she
answered, slamming her fist into her palm,
“You know, those people who go, ‘THIS IS
WHAT’S RIGHT AND YOU’RE GOING TO
FOLLOW IT.” The notion that the Fellowship
was ultimately forcing Sauron to follow their
particular version of right evidently did not
occur to her.
Later in the day, though, one person was
finally able to judge something as wrong.
When asked what he would do with the ring of
power if he had the opportunity, Andy Serkis
(Gollum) stated, "I would banish all religions
first of all."
Total Depravity v. Innate
Goodness
In a letter to a friend, Tolkien once wrote, “The
Power of Evil in the world is not finally
resistible by incarnate creatures, however
'good'.” Bringing this belief to bear on his
work, he infused his novels with the biblical
principle that no one is righteous: Boromir
betrays the Fellowship out of lust for power,
Gandalf refuses the ring because he
recognizes his own weakness, Gollum
illustrates a life completely ravaged by
covetousness, and even the pure Hobbit
Frodo is eventually no match for the seduction
of the evil. Yet, while they did an admirable job
portraying this reality on screen, none of those
responsible for creating these characters
were able to see it.
Elijah Wood said of Frodo’s journey, “I don’t
know if [a higher power] necessarily pertains
to Frodo’s particular journey. The way that
Frodo gets through is ultimately in his own will
and his courage and his own inner strength …
that’s what gets him through.”
Ian McKellan echoed the idea that salvation in
Middle Earth comes from within: “I think what
Tolkien’s appealing to in human beings is to
look inside yourself. That’s why they join a
fellowship, they don’t join a church.”
Screenwriter Fran Walsh took this notion
further still, even claiming that Tolkien was
"passionately arguing for the goodness that
resides in men." She went on to say, “If
anything, Tolkien’s faith informs the third book
— faith that the enduring goodness of men
will prevail. … It’s about the enduring power of
goodness that we feel in ourselves and
perceive in others. … ”
Christian Truth v. Postmodern
Perspective
Tolkien knew, and his books clearly show, that
there is an order to the universe and, as such,
an Orderer. He once wrote to a friend, “I do not
expect ‘history’ to be anything but a ‘long
defeat’ — though it contains … some
samples or glimpses of final victory.” He
believed, as he told his friend C. S. Lewis, that
if he could create an echo of the one true myth,
that of Christ, he could disarm cynical readers
and point them toward that victory in spite of
themselves. While his myth has had
significant success at this over the years, it
has yet to work its influence on those who
introduced it to a new generation of fans.
Being confronted with the faith contained in
Tolkien’s fiction only seemed to confound the
wisdom of these giants of entertainment.
To those (unknowingly?) enmeshed in
postmodern ideology, not only is truth up for
interpretation, so is the work of truth’s
champions. Evidence (such as letters and
statements written by Tolkien himself) and
facts (such as his faithful attendance and
involvement in his church) somehow have no
influence on their understanding. Like many
college students, the cast and crew of The
Lord of the Rings apparently believe that
there are no “right” or “wrong” answers when it
comes to the meaning of a
particular text. Everything is subjective, so
that meaning (including Tolkien’s) isn’t based
on the author’s intentions, but on the
experience of the reader. Good and evil are
merely creations of the ideology of the
beholder.
Yet if evil is a mere creation ideology, then
The Lord of the Rings is nothing more
than the story of a group that forces it’s
ideology on another group. Why, then, did
actors, screenwriters, and director alike revel
in the round defeat of Mordor? If evil is merely
a creation of ideology, then the victory of the
Fellowship deserves our celebration no more
than, say, colonialism. Why, then, were
actors, screenwriters, and director alike stirred
by Tolkien’s depiction of faith, fellowship, and
victory? Though the power of their own “rings”
may yet be “binding them in the darkness,” let
us hope that some part of their hearts
recognized echoes of the Other story.
Perhaps over the years, as they look back on
their stunning cinematic achievement,
Jackson and company will one day come to
embrace the truth contained in their films. In
the meantime, we can follow Tolkien’s
example and continue pointing the lost toward
Grey Havens.
Copyright © 2004 Megan Basham. All rights
reserved. International copyright secured.
Photo Copyright © 2003 Pixel Dance, Inc. and
its licensors. All rights reserved.
To request permission to reprint this article,
click here.
|